Showing posts with label Nato. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nato. Show all posts

Sunday, 30 October 2022

Don't Be like Alexis Castillo, Don't Die for Red-Brown trash

Alexis Castillo was a Black man who was born in Colombia and spent his childhood in Spain. He seemed to have been involved in some left-wing activities there and he ends-up joining a pro-Russian militia in East Ukraine in circa 2014 when Russia attempted to claim the Donetsk area. It has been reported he has been killed allegedly by shelling, pro-Russian sources imply it was shelling by Kyiv forces.  

Some are glorifying that a Black migrant to Europe ends up dying for Putin's dirty supremacist war of invasion, occupation and annexation of another people's country, a war which is also a Nato proxy war that sees Western imperialism successfully bait Putin into a war of entrapment. We deplore and denounce this glorification for a number of reasons, not least that Putin's war is conducted totally by racist right-wing nationalist forces in an explicit manner. 

Lenin was a revolutionary against Russian chauvinism and all chauvinism and racism, he was on-point when it came to oppressed peoples and their path towards liberation. Lenin inspired many oppressed peoples including the Pan-Africanist pioneer Marcus Garvey who called Lenin the greatest man in the world, and rightly so. 

Putin's Ukraine war is the counter-opposite  of Lenin in the explicit words of Putin himself when he made the speech explaining his war on Ukraine: "Soviet Ukraine is the result of the Bolsheviks’ policy and can be rightfully called “Vladimir Lenin’s Ukraine.” He was its creator and architect. This is fully and comprehensively corroborated by archival documents, including Lenin’s harsh instructions regarding Donbass, which was actually shoved into Ukraine. And today the “grateful progeny” has overturned monuments to Lenin in Ukraine. They call it decommunization. You want decommunization? Very well, this suits us just fine. But why stop halfway? We are ready to show what real decommunizations would mean for Ukraine."

This is not a war any Black person or any person should be invested in. The Ukrainians have been invaded and their land is being taken away in an overt act of colonialism by Putin, in a sense the Ukrainians have the moral high ground and it's understandable they get sympathy from people as invasion, occupation and colonial annexation is so immoral that it will garner some sympathies. However, no one should be going to fight on the Ukrainian side either as it is tainted by the strategic involvement of Nato. 

On Putin's side you have the total control of very racist, right-wing and often far-right nationalists who control Russia annexed areas of Ukraine and the Russian state itself. Putin has long openly promoted anti-Black and racist politics across the world and saw it fit kidnap and weaponise a young Black gay woman - Britney Griner - for his war strategies and culture war against those opposing white supremacy racism. 

Alexis Castillo must have noticed the endless senior and mass right-wing nationalist head jobs around him, did he share any of these reflections and observations with anyone? Did anyone encourage him to see that killing, injuring, maiming and dying for Putin's far-right project is perhaps something he should refrain from doing? We would be interested to hear from anyone who knew him if there were problems around this that he experienced or commented on. No one who goes to the Russian occupied areas of Ukraine can be unaware of the fact that it is controlled by racist and far-right oligarchs and nationalists unless they are drunk off the red-brown juice that befuddles their brains to mush.

Those that are glorifying a Black migrants death for the cause of racism and colonialism should perhaps go themselves to die for this cause if they consider it so glorious? Why aren't they engaging in organising themselves to die for their trashy sleazy racist leader? The fact is that those who are posturing on the tragic death of Alexis Castillo are committed to deceit, lies and manipulation in order to peddle their industry of fascist collaboration because their own grift and narcissism informs it. We call for the smashing of this racist racket. Pictured is a photo of leading British fascist in the vanguard of attacking migrants and especially Muslim communities Tommy Robinson / Stephen Yaxley-Lennon standing in the offices of what he considered his 'favourite news channel': Russia Today / RT. To encourage a Black migrant to Europe to fight and die for a cause whose leaders have and continue to demonise exactly such migrants and countless attacks on them by racists and racist states is an act of shameless racism. 

Tuesday, 25 October 2016

Launching new historic DVD and book on Libyan Popular Anti-Imperialist Resistance



Launching new historic DVD and book on Libyan Popular Anti-Imperialist Resistance

The Malcolm X Movement proudly hosts the premier of a hard-hitting, informative and inspiring look at African and Libyan popular anti-imperialist resistance entitled Nato War on Libya (53mins). We are also hosting at the same event a book launch of a collection of writings about the martyrdom of Muammar Gaddafi entitled On the Martyrdom of Muammar Gaddafi: 21st Century Fascism and Resistance. One of our MXM coordinators - Sukant Chandan is the editor of the book and the filmmaker of the doc.

The event takes place this Sat 29th Oct at 6pm at Marx Memorial Library,  EC1R 0DU (£5 suggested entry). The Libyan community are kindly and generously providing free Libyan snacks and refreshments at this event.

Please find the Facebook event page HERE.

In solidarity
MXM Coordinators Team

Sunday, 14 August 2016

Gaddafi’s Ghosts: Return of the Libyan Jamahiriya



Gaddafi’s Ghosts: Return of the Libyan Jamahiriya

By Malcolm X Movement Coordinator, Dan Glazebrook (this article first appeared on RT.com)

When NATO murdered Gaddafi and blitzed his country in 2011, they hoped the socialist ‘Jamahiriya’ movement he led would be dead and buried. Now his son has been released from prison to a hero’s welcome with his movement increasingly in the ascendancy.

There were various moments during NATO’s destruction of Libya that were supposed to symbolically crown Western supremacy over Libya and its institutions (and, by implication, over all African and Arab peoples): the ‘fall of Tripoli’ in August 2011; Cameron and Sarkozy’s victory speeches the following month; the lynch-mob execution of Muammar Gaddafi that came soon after. All of them were pyrrhic victories - but none more so than the death sentence handed down to Gaddafi’s son (and effective deputy leader) Saif al-Gaddafi in July 2015.

Saif had been captured by the Zintan militia shortly after his father and brother were killed by NATO’s death squads in late 2011. The ‘International’ Criminal Court – a neocolonial farce which has only ever indicted Africans – demanded he be handed over to them, but the Zintan – fiercely patriotic despite having fought with NATO against Gaddafi – refused. Over the next two years the country descended into the chaos and societal collapse that Gaddafi had predicted, sliding inexorably towards civil war.

By 2014, the country’s militias had coalesced around two main groupings – the Libyan National Army, composed of those who supported the newly elected, and mainly secular, House of Representatives; and the Libya Dawn coalition, composed of the militias who supported the Islamist parties that had dominated the country’s previous parliament but refused to recognize their defeat at the polls in 2014. After fierce fighting, the Libya Dawn faction took control of Tripoli. It was there that Saif, along with dozens of other officials of the Jamahiriya – the Libyan ‘People’s State’ which Gaddafi had led – were put on trial for their life. However, once again the Zintan militia – allied to the Libyan National Army - refused to hand him over. After a trial condemned by human rights groups as “riddled with legal flaws”, in a court system dominated by the Libya Dawn militias, an absent Saif was sentenced to death, along with eight other former government officials. The trial was never recognized by the elected government, by then relocated to Tobruk. A gloating Western media made sure to inform the world of the death sentence, which they hoped would extinguish forever the Libyan people’s hopes for a restoration of the independence, peace and prosperity his family name had come to represent.

It was a hope that would soon be dashed. Less than a year later, the France 24 news agency arranged an interview with Saif Al Gaddafi’s lawyer Karim Khan in which he revealed to the world that Saif had in fact, “been given his liberty on April 12, 2016", in accordance with the amnesty law passed by the Tobruk parliament the previous year. Given the crowing over Saif’s death sentence the previous year, and his indictment by the International Criminal Court, this was a major story. Yet, by and large, it was one the Western media chose to steadfastly ignore - indeed, the BBC did not breathe a single word about it.

What is so significant about his release, however, is what it represents: the recognition, by Libya’s elected authorities, that there is no future for Libya without the involvement of the Jamahiriya movement.

The truth is, this movement never went away. Rather, having been forced underground in 2011, it has been increasingly coming out into the open, building up its support amongst a population sick of the depravities and deprivations of the post-Gaddafi era.

Exactly five years ago, following the start of the NATO bombing campaign, Libyans came out onto the streets in massive demonstrations in support of their government in Tripoli, Sirte, Zlitan and elsewhere. Even the BBC admitted that “there is no discounting the genuine support that exists”, adding that "’Muammar is the love of millions’ was the message written on the hands of women in the square”.

Following the US-UK-Qatari invasion of Tripoli the following month, however, the reign of terror by NATO’s death squad militias ensured that public displays of such sentiments could end up costing one’s life. Tens of thousands of ‘suspected Gaddafi supporters’ were rounded up by the militias in makeshift ‘detention camps’ were torture and abuse was rife; around 7,000 are estimated to be there still to this day, and hundreds have been summarily executed.

Black people in particular were targeted, seen as symbolic of the pro-African policies pursued by Gaddafi but hated by the supremacist militias, with the black Libyan town of Tawergha turned into a ghost town overnight as Misratan militias made good on their promise to kill all those who refused to leave. Such activities were effectively legalised by the NATO-imposed ‘Transitional National Council’ whose Laws 37 and 38 decreed that public support for Gaddafi could be punished by life imprisonment and activities taken ‘in defence of the revolution’ would be exempt from prosecution.

Nevertheless, over the years that followed, as the militias turned on each other and the country rapidly fell apart, reports began to suggest that much of southern Libya was slowly coming under the control of Gaddafi’s supporters. On January 18th 2014, an air force base near the southern city of Sabha was taken by Gaddafi loyalists, frightening the new government enough to impose a state of emergency, ban Libya’s two pro-Gaddafi satellite stations, and embark on aerial bombing missions in the south of the country.

But it was, ironically, the passing of the death sentences themselves – intended to extinguish pro-Gaddafi sentiment for good - that triggered the most open and widespread demonstrations of support for the former government so far, with protests held in August 2015 across the country, and even in ISIS-held Sirte. Middle East Eye reported the following from the demonstration in Sabha (in which 7 were killed when militias opened fire on the protesters): “Previous modest pro-Gaddafi celebrations in the town had been overlooked by the Misratan-led Third Force, stationed in Sabha for over a year - originally to act as a peacekeeping force following local clashes.

‘This time, I think the Third Force saw the seriousness of the pro-Gaddafi movement because a demonstration this big has not been seen in the last four years,’ said Mohamed. ‘There were a lot of people, including women and children, and people were not afraid to show their faces … IS had threatened to shoot anyone who protested on Friday, so there were no green flags in towns they control, apart from Sirte, although there are some green flags flying in remote desert areas,’ he said. ‘But if these protests get stronger across the whole of Libya, people will become braver and we will see more green flags. I know many people who are just waiting for the right time to protest.’”

In Sirte, demonstrators were fired at by ISIS fighters, who dispersed the group and took away seven people, including four women. The same Middle East Eye report made the following comment: “The protests have been a public representation of a badly kept secret in Libya, that the pro-Gaddafi movement which has existed since the 2011 revolution has grown in strength, born out of dissatisfaction with the way life has worked out for many ordinary citizens in the last four years…[Mohamed] added that some people who had originally supported the 2011 revolution had joined the protests. Most Libyans just want a quiet life. They don’t care who takes over or who controls Libya’s money, they just want a comfortable life. That’s why Gaddafi stayed in power for 42 years. Salaries were paid on time, we had good subsidies on all the essentials and living was cheap.”